6 Interestingly, activation levels of the superficial core muscles (lumbar multifidus, internal oblique, iliocostalis lumborum pars thoracis, external oblique, rectus abdominus, and erector spinae) were found to be similar between sittings on stable and unstable surfaces.6 and 11 It was speculated that profound core muscles may be more MAPK Inhibitor Library concentration active during active sitting.6 To date, biomechanical analyses
of active sitting were constrained to data obtained from 5 to 10 min sitting tests.6 and 11 As prolonged sitting was thought to inflict low-back conditions,2 it is important to examine the trunk biomechanics during active sitting over a longer time period (e.g., 30 min or more). Furthermore, the effect of active sitting on the pattern of foot center of pressure has been overlooked in the past. Although it was reported that sitting on an unstable surface results in increased spinal motion,6 it is not clear whether Volasertib molecular weight core muscles are exclusively used to modulate the trunk position. In a recent study, some leg muscles such as hip adductors, soleus, and tibialis anterior were found to increase their activity levels as the level
of sitting compliance increases.11 Thus, it may be possible that lower-extremities may partially contribute to the adjustment of the trunk posture during active sitting. However, it has yet to be determined whether lower extremities play a role in maintaining trunk posture during active sitting. In particular, the patterns of the foot center of pressure Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase need to be examined. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if increased seating surface compliance would result in increased trunk motion during prolonged sitting. As the seating surface becomes unstable, there could be
an increase of the trunk motion. We hypothesized that the stability ball and air-cushion conditions would significantly increase trunk motion signified by increased trunk range of motion (T_ANG), trunk angular speed (T_AVEL), and trunk center of mass speed (T_COM), compared to the stable chair condition. The secondary purpose of this study was to examine whether lower-extremities are involved in active sitting. As seating surface compliance increases, it may be possible to have some contribution from the lower-legs to the adjustment of the trunk posture. Thus, we hypothesized that the unstable seating surfaces may lead to increases of foot center of pressure speed during sitting. Fifteen healthy females (age = 25.8 ± 10.3 years; height = 164.1 ± 7.1 cm; mass = 64.5 ± 12.8 kg) who sit for an average of 8 h per day volunteered for this study. Participants had a body mass index below 30 kg/m2 (23.8 ± 3.7 kg/m2), no known neuromuscular conditions, no history of low-back pain, and were able to sit for three 30-min sessions while maintaining upright posture. Each participant completed an informed consent document approved by the Ball State University Institutional Review Board.