In addition, overexpression of E-cadherin in EpiSCs also increases the proportion of chimaeras following blastocyst injection [ 27]. Excitingly, EpiSCs have recently been shown to participate efficiently in development when introduced into the appropriate

environment of the post-implantation embryo, before but not following the loss of embryonic pluripotency [ 28•]. Underscoring the importance of this finding, ES cells lack this ability [ 28•]. These selleck findings demonstrate that the ability to reveal the developmental competence of a cell line depends not only upon the intrinsic state of the cells but also requires a match between the developmental stage of the ‘captured’ cell line and the host environment: chimaera formation can occur when functionally equivalent cultured cells

and host tissue are juxtaposed. TFs expressed in the Nanog positive epiblast cells of the ICM, such as Esrrb, Klf4, Klf5, Rex1 and Tbx3 are undetectable in the E7.5 epiblast [29, 30, 31 and 32]. The requirement for pluripotency TFs during implantation is relatively difficult to study due to the inaccessibility of the peri-implantation embryo. However, the derivation of EpiSC by passaging of ES cells in serum free medium supplemented with Activin/FGF [24] provides a tractable model for studying the transition in pluripotent states that occurs at implantation. Several of the pluripotency TFs downregulated following implantation are also downregulated in EpiSCs [4]. Among the

core pluripotency factors, Oct4 expression Selleckchem p38 MAPK inhibitor is maintained, whereas Sox2 and Nanog expression are reduced [4, 24 and 26]. In ES cells, Nanog directs transcription of a cohort of regulators SB-3CT of pre-implantation pluripotency that are differentially expressed between ES cells and EpiSCs, including Esrrb, Klf4, Klf5, Rex1 and Tbx3 [33••] (Figure 2). Therefore, these genes may be co-ordinately down-regulated in response to declining Nanog levels at the peri-implantation stage. Perhaps reduced concentrations of Nanog and/or Nanog target gene(s) may be required to facilitate the pre-implantation to post-implantation pluripotency transition. Supporting the importance of Nanog downregulation at implantation, ES cells overexpressing Nanog resist differentiation into EpiSCs, and retain, albeit at reduced levels, expression of ES cell markers after repeated passaging in Activin/FGF [4]. Resistance to differentiation is directly correlated with the Nanog level [4], suggesting that high Nanog concentrations stabilise ES cell pluripotency even in the presence of differentiation signals such as retinoic acid, 3-methoxybenzamide or Activin/FGF [4 and 8]. New studies have identified two basic helix-loop-helix TFs that operate at this juncture. Tcf15 becomes expressed in the epiblast just before implantation and represses Nanog [34].