Efficiency of the IMM as screening assay without confirmation was estimated as 93.5% (429/459). The IMM with confirming culture method had an efficiency of 97.8%. This means that results obtained with the IMM test exhibited a high agreement with the reference culture method. Detection limit The detection limit of the IMM test was determined by testing water samples spiked with different L. pneumophila (ATCC 33152) concentrations at 5 different levels (Table 2). The detection limit was defined as the lowest number of cultivable

Selleckchem Niraparib L. pneumophila organisms (confirmed by culture) that can be detected with a probability of 50%. On the basis of this criterion, the detection limit of IMM for L. pneumophila was determined as 93 CFU per volume examined for the studied matrices. Here the volume

examined is the filtered volume of the original water sample. Table 2 Summary of immunomagnetic test and ISO reference method results for the estimation of www.selleckchem.com/products/baricitinib-ly3009104.html LOD 50 Level no. Culture count, CFU/mL IMM presumptive positive/total portions tested 1 0 0/6 2 3.4 0/10 3 15.1 14/30 4 20.4 7/10 5 68.3 10/10 DNA Damage inhibitor Collaborative trial Table 3 shows the results of the eleven accepted laboratories that have evaluated the IMM test. The concentrations estimated by the color chart of the IMM test were highly coincident with the reported culture results for each one of the three groups of samples prepared with certified reference material (pills) containing L. pneumophila. For the two pills used as negative control, not having L. pneumophila, this bacterium was not detected by any of the two methods (culture isolation and IMM test) in any of the participating laboratories. Coincidence between both methods was of 95.8%. Comparison gave good results, with clear coincidence with the standard culture method but a higher check details rate of analysis. Table 3 Legionella pneumophila determination

in collaborative trial, Log (CFU/9 mL) (by participant no.) a     Culture results Immunomagnetic results Level of spikingbLog10CFU/9 mL Pill Culture count log10CFU/9 mLc Estimated magnitude order log10CFU/9 mL Qualitative resultsd     1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 0 P6 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND A A A A A A A A A A A   P8 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND A A A A A A A A A A A 2.23 P4 2.83 2.22 2.21 2.47 2.57 2.11 2.38 2.23 2.73 1.98 2.32 3.0 <3.0 3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 P P P P P P P P P P P   P7 2.11 2.16 2.36 2.25 2.13 2.11 2.10 2.01 2.17 1.90 2.32 <4.0 <3.0 <4.0 <4.0 <3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 <4.0 2.0 3.0 P P P P P P P P P P P 2.88 P1 3.07 2.86 3.12 3.19 3.04 1.99 2.99 2.96 2.69 2.78 2.85 4.0 3.0 3.0 <4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.