When adult participants are presented with real words and non-words in isolation, real words elicit stronger EEG coherence in the beta-band in comparison to the resting

state, but non-words do not LY2109761 (von Stein, Rappelsberger, Sarnthein, & Petshe, 1999). This indicates that lexical processing induces beta-band synchronization in adults. The beta-band increase in phase synchronization found in our infants suggests that the same neural network may be recruited for processing words already at the age of 11 months. The third key finding is that the N400 component was significantly larger for sound symbolically mismatching than matching pairs. The difference in ERP amplitude between the match and mismatch condition suggests that 11-month-olds’ brain sensitively responds to congruency of sound-shape correspondences. Furthermore, the timing and topography of this ERP modulation is strikingly similar to the typical N400 effect (Kutas & Federmeier, 2011). Although there is widespread agreement in the literature that the N400

response reflects semantic integration difficulty both in adults and infants (Friedrich and Friederici, 2005, Friedrich and Friederici, 2011, Kutas and Federmeier, 2011 and Parise and Csibra, Vorinostat in vivo 2012), the neural mechanism underlying N400 is not perfectly understood (Kutas & Federmeier, 2011), especially in infants. In our case, however, the results from the amplitude change in the earlier time window along with the large-scale posterior-anterior synchrony observed in the beta band over the left hemisphere in the N400 time window jointly suggest that N400 modulation reflects the detection of an anomaly at a conceptual

rather than perceptual level. Indeed, when visual shape and spoken word were sound-symbolically mismatched, it was more difficult for infants to integrate the two and establish the pairing. In other words, sound symbolism may help infants to acquire the concept of word from novel sound-referent Protein tyrosine phosphatase pairing. This study goes beyond effects of sound symbolism previously demonstrated in infant behavioural measures (Maurer et al., 2006, Ozturk et al., 2013, Peña et al., 2011 and Walker et al., 2010), as it revealed the neural processes linking perceptual cross-modal processing and language development. The amplitude change, phase synchronization, and ERP results jointly indicate that, while it is processed in a cross-modal perceptual network, sound symbolism triggers semantic processing in the left hemisphere mapping speech sounds to visually presented referents. Sound symbolism may serve as an important bootstrapping mechanism for establishing referential insights for speech sounds.