This is not what we have observed, since ectopic expression of recU led to a reversal of the phenotypes observed in the absence of RecU, namely the presence of anucleate cells and cells with septa over DNA (Figure  2A-C). This indicates that CP673451 molecular weight although RecU may have a role in preventing chromosome trapping by the septum, co-regulation of recU and pbp2 expression from the same operon is not required during cell division. Conclusions

We have shown that lack of S. aureus RecU protein has important consequences in the cells, doubling the duplication time, increasing the susceptibility to DNA damage and leading to the appearance of a large population of cells with compact nucleoids, lacking a nucleoid or with septa placed over the chromosome. This shows that the role of RecU in chromosome segregation and DNA repair is crucial for normal growth of S. aureus cells. RecU is encoded in the same operon as the cell wall synthesis protein PBP2 and consequently the two proteins are overexpressed under certain conditions, such as in the presence of cell wall targeting antibiotics [50]. We have selleck inhibitor shown that this genetic organization is not required for correct cell division in rich medium, but it selleck chemicals llc remains to be determined if it becomes advantageous under other, more clinically relevant, conditions. Acknowledgements This work was funded by

grants PTDC/BIA-BCM/66449/2006, PTDC/BIA-BCM/099152/2008 and PEst-OE/EQB/LA0004/2011 from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia. P.R. and H.V. were supported by fellowships SFRH/BPD/23812/2005 and SFRH/BD/38732/2007, respectively. The anti-FtsZ antibody was kindly provided by Dr. E.J. Harry (University of Technology, Sydney, Australia). References 1. Kuzminov A: Instability of inhibited replication forks in E. coli. Bioessays 1995, 17:733–741.PubMedCrossRef

2. Mirkin this website EV, Mirkin SM: Replication fork stalling at natural impediments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2007, 71:13–35.PubMedCrossRef 3. Cox MM, Goodman MF, Kreuzer KN, Sherratt DJ, Sandler SJ, Marians KJ: The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 2000, 404:37–41.PubMedCrossRef 4. Michel B, Boubakri H, Baharoglu Z, LeMasson M, Lestini R: Recombination proteins and rescue of arrested replication forks. DNA Repair 2007, 6:967–980.PubMedCrossRef 5. Wyman C, Ristic D, Kanaar R: Homologous recombination-mediated double-strand break repair. DNA Repair 2004, 3:827–833.PubMedCrossRef 6. Cromie GA, Connelly JC, Leach DR: Recombination at double-strand breaks and DNA ends: conserved mechanisms from phage to humans. Mol Cell 2001, 8:1163–1174.PubMedCrossRef 7. Ayora S, Carrasco B, Doncel-Perez E, Lurz R, Alonso JC: Bacillus subtilis RecU protein cleaves Holliday junctions and anneals single-stranded DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:452–457.PubMedCrossRef 8.