The largest trial5 alone represented nearly 70% of observations

The largest trial5 alone represented nearly 70% of observations. Based on that trial, past research has shown no difference between peginterferon alfa-2a and peginterferon alfa-2b with respect to SVR. This underlines the importance of sensitivity analyses for examining the robustness of Awad et al.’s conclusions. Because the authors showed that there was no evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0) among the eight studies that they included, a fixed effects model

approach is appropriate. I applied a fixed effects exact inference procedure (proposed by Tian et al.6) as a sensitivity analysis to the data shown in Fig. 2 of Awad et al.’s article. This method is unbiased even for selleck chemicals small samples or when only a small number of studies are included in the meta-analysis. This robust method yielded a 95% confidence interval for

the risk ratio of 0.988-1.214, which included the null value of 1. A similar analysis limited to the approved starting dose of 1.5 μg/kg/week (which excluded 1016 of the 3070 patients in the IDEAL trial) also showed a lack of a statistically significant difference with an exact 95% confidence interval of 0.967-1.214. The discrepancy between the findings based on large sample methods and those based on exact methods emphasizes the need for Selleck ABT263 thorough sensitivity analyses using a variety of appropriate statistical methods whenever possible. Here, the use of an exact method, which is likely more appropriate because of the limited number of studies, shows no statistically significant difference between the two drugs; this result directly contradicts the findings of Awad et al.1 Aside from the biases resulting from the reliance on large sample properties when statistical analyses of small

samples are being performed, current meta-analyses often reduce a complicated, multitrial meta-analysis to a single parameter from which absolute conclusions are drawn. A number of recent articles, including ones by Wang et al.7 and Cai et al.,8, 9 present a method that, applied to the issue of peginterferon alfa-2a versus peginterferon alfa-2b, would provide clinicians with clearer guidance about which product is most likely to be an appropriate treatment for any given patient. Pierre Crémieux Ph.D.*, * Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA. “
“To selleck chemical the Editor: Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is considered to be an autoimmune disorder. When not adequately responding to medical treatment, PBC often progresses to liver cirrhosis, necessitating liver transplantation.[1] This constitutes a need for the development of animal models, both to unravel pathogenetic pathways and to test innovative therapeutic agents. Gershwin and his group have greatly contributed to this endeavor and in their most recent and intriguing manuscript successfully test a novel therapeutic approach in a well-established PBC model.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>