Only the assessor’s perception of resistance was used to determine the end-range of knee joint angle (de Weijer et al 2003). Another factor that may have influenced the end point of the test is the degree to which the participants relaxed, thereby either voluntarily or subconsciously changing the contraction of the hamstrings during the test. This would be consistent GPCR Compound Library with recent research in which stretching regimens produced no shift of the torque/angle curves or change in muscle stiffness (Law et al 2009, Ben and Harvey, 2010), suggesting alterations in tolerance might explain the increases in end-range

joint angle. Modification in sensation may occur by stimulating muscle spindle primary endings during vibration (Ribot-Ciscar et al 1998). This in turn may allow increases in end-range joint angles NVP-BKM120 nmr (Halbertsma et al 1996). Although

the consistency of the applied torque is uncertain with our measurement, one explanation could be that the amount of background tension within the vibrated muscles reduced due to a decreased spontaneous firing rate in the muscle spindle primary endings after vibration (Ribot-Ciscar et al 1998), which may allow greater excursion of the knee. However, the occurrence of these changes needs to be proven by measuring the amount of applied torque, stiffness, and muscle cross-sectional area (Weppler and Magnusson 2010). Another theoretical mechanism is that vibration applied over muscles may enhance blood circulation, which may produce a thermal effect. This thermal effect can be amplified by heat generation caused by the vibration of muscle fibres as well as the vasodilatation of cutaneous and deep blood vessels (Oliveri et al 1989). Although heat

can facilitate muscular extensibility (Knight et al 2001), any heat would have dissipated between the last vibration session and testing. The possibility that the vibration increased the ‘length’ of the hamstrings should also be considered. Using vibration on the human body has Parvulin been studied for several decades (Hagbarth 1973, Delecluse et al 2003, Kinser et al 2008). Some of the studies focus on the effect of vibration on the muscle strength or flexibility (Fagnani et al 2006, Jacobs and Burns 2009, Kinser et al 2008). Most of these studies used whole body vibration to improve flexibility in athletic or normal subjects (Fagnani et al 2006, Sands et al 2008). Although most of these studies identified the beneficial effect of vibration on simple clinical tests intended to assess muscle length (Issurin 2005, Issurin et al 1994, Sands et al 2008), in a recent study Cronin and colleagues (2008) showed no benefit from hamstring vibration on the dynamic knee range of motion. However, their method for application of vibration was different from other studies, as they used vibration on the hamstrings muscles and recorded knee flexion, which would be limited by quadriceps extensibility.