“Objective: To determine whether either of two magnetic re


“Objective: To determine whether either of two magnetic resonance imaging approaches – delayed gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC), or T2 mapping – can detect short-term changes in knee hyaline cartilage CH5424802 among individuals taking a formulation of collagen hydrolysate.

Design: Single center, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, pilot trial of collagen hydrolysate for mild

knee osteoarthritis (OA). Participants were allowed to continue the prior analgesic use. The primary outcome was change in dGEMRIC T1 relaxation time in the cartilage regions of interest at the 24-week timepoint. Secondary endpoints included the change in dGEMRIC T1 relaxation time between baseline and 48 weeks, the change in GSK2126458 order T2 relaxation time at 0, 24 and 48 weeks, the symptom and functional measures obtained at each of the visits, and overall analgesic use.

Results: Among a sample of 30 randomized subjects the dGEMRIC score increased in the medial and lateral tibial regions of interest (median increase of 29 and 41 ms respectively) in participants assigned to collagen hydrolysate but decreased (median decline 37 and 36 ms respectively) in the placebo arm with the changes between the two groups at 24 weeks reaching significance. No other significant changes between the two

groups were seen in the other four regions, or in any of 5-Fluoracil concentration the 12 values or in the clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that the dGEMRIC technique may be able to detect change in proteoglycan content in knee cartilage among individuals taking collagen hydrolysate after 24 weeks. (C) 2011 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Airtraq use by inexperienced personnel has been evaluated in simulator studies, but little is known about the learning process in real patients. This prospective study was designed to compare learning curves for laryngoscopy with the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes

in patients under general anesthesia.

Ten medical students with no prior experience in airway management were recruited on a voluntary basis and underwent training in Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopy. Patients with no difficult intubation criteria were enrolled after consent. Each student performed laryngoscopy with either device on ten consecutive patients. Success was defined as Cormack-Lehane grading a parts per thousand currency sign2. We also recorded subjective difficulty scores on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Learning curves were drawn using cumulative success rates and 95% confidence intervals calculated with bootstrap procedures.

The mean (95% CI) success rates for the procedures were 86.0% (76.7-93.3%) for the Airtraq and 64.0% (52.0-75.0%) for the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Comments are closed.