However, among men aged older than 70 years, 42.9% continued to be sexually active. This result reminds us that there is no a limitation to the maintenance of a sexual life (10). The problem of the lack of a partner, Selleck ABT 263 which is often reported in series of elderly and aging populations, was not observed here because all the patients were in a couple or married. In a recent study in Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Huyghe et al. (11) had observed that the lack of a sexual partner was less frequent as a cause of cessation of sexuality in men than in women. The PB is not the only treatment modality of localized early penile cancer. Among the other treatments available for localized early disease, there are partial

penectomy, reconstruction glansectomy, laser therapy, and glans resurfacing. All these treatments may be disfiguring and may have an impact on the patient’s sexual function, sexual intercourse, self-image,

and self-esteem. In this study, see more there were no patients who were treated with partial amputation of the penis. It would be interesting to use the same questionnaire in a surgical population to assess the real impact of the partial amputation of the penis on sexuality. To date, most studies have focused on sexual function in men treated with amputation of the penis, but they have not explored the impact of treatment on male behavior. They have quickly concluded a low impact of partial amputations on sexual function. Romero et al. (12), questioning a population of 18 men, reported that 55.6% maintained erectile function Carnitine dehydrogenase during sexual intercourse, and 72% maintained ejaculation and orgasm during each sexual intercourse. However, only 33.3% had frequent sexual intercourse before surgery. Among those with no more sexual activity, the main reasons were the

small size of their penis and lack of glans. On a meta-analysis, Maddineni et al. (13) found a greater impact of the partial amputation of the penis, with an absence of sexual function (assessed by IIEF score-15) in 36–67% of the patients. It is interesting to compare the information provided by patients treated surgically and PB for the sense of manliness. In a series of 17 patients treated with partial (n = 11) or total amputation (n = 4) of the penis, Ficarra et al. (14) had found that emotional and mood disorders were common in this population, with 35% with “problems in society,” 29.5% pathologic anxiety, and 6% depression. The loss of masculinity and the inability to penetrate is likely to cause emotional stress, and it can therefore be expected that patients treated with total or partial amputation of the penis feel it to varying degrees. As in our study, 100% of the patients said that their virility had not been altered; PB is a treatment that probably has less psychological impact than penile surgery. A therapeutic alternative for small lesions of the penis is yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser ablation. In 2004, Windahl et al.