89 [95%CI 1.45–2.46, P < 0.001] with an increase in RI of 0.1 (Fig. 2). Conclusion: Higher RI resulted in an increase in the risk for CKD progression. LIM SOO KUN1, THEVARAJAH MALATHI2, CHEW YEE YEAN2, NG KOK PENG1, TAN LI PING1, WONG CHEW MING1, KENG TEE CHAU1, CHONG YIP BOON1, KONG WAI YEW1 1Renal Division, Department of Medicine, University of Malaya; 2Department of Pathology, University of Malaya Introduction: Quantification

of proteinuria is an essential part of chronic LY2157299 datasheet kidney disease management. Proteinuria predicts progression of kidney disease and long term cardiovascular risk. Twenty-four-hour urine protein is the gold standard method of proteinuria quantification but have major limitations. A spot urine sample for protein-creatinine see more ratio (uPCR) and albumin-creatinine ratio (uACR) have been commonly used in routine practices but there is no consensus on the optimal test to estimate proteinuria in kidney diseases. Objectives: 1. To examine the relationship between uPCR and uACR and 24-hour urine protein. 2. To study the diagnostic

performance of uPCR and uACR in estimating proteinuria. Methodology: This is a prospective cross-sectional study that recruited patients who attended renal clinic and had urine dipstick positive for protein. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected as per standard protocol. Spot urine samples were collected in the morning upon completion of 24-hour urine collection and uPCR and uACR were performed. Demographic details, clinical data and laboratory test results were captured from patient medical records. The correlation between uPCR and uACR to 24-hour urine protein excretion was assessed. The diagnostic value of uPCR and uACR was expressed in sensitivity and specificity. Results: 187 patients were recruited with mean age of 58.3 ± 14.6 years and 51% were male. Diabetes mellitus

(49%) is the main aetiology of kidney disease, followed by lupus nephritis (16%), IgA nephropathy (14%) and hypertension (11%). The Chlormezanone mean serum creatinine was 181 μmol/L with estimated glomerular filtration rate of 46 ml/min/1.73 m2. There is good correlation between uPCR and uACR with 24-hour urine protein, with r value of 0.84 and 0.89 respectively (p < 0.01). For proteinuriavs 16%). For significant proteinuria (≥1 g per day), both uPCR and uACR have almost similar sensitivity and specificity (98 to 100%). Conclusion: Spot uPCR and uACR correlate well with 24-hour urine protein excretion. uPCR is a better test to estimate proteinuria, with better specificity, in case of positive urine dipstick for protein.