In addition, it has been reported that there is no significant difference in the detection sensitivity between ultrasonography JQ1 chemical structure alone and ultrasonography plus AFP measurements for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance (LF037274 level 2a). In contrast, according to one report, use of
ultrasonography and AFP measurements in combination as screening procedures increased the sensitivity of detection of hepatocellular carcinoma as compared with the use of either test alone in cirrhosis patients (LF026893 level 2a). The sensitivity and specificity of screening ultrasonographic diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis are reportedly 78–90% and 93–93.8%, respectively (LF026893 level 2a, LF037274 level 2a, LF030695 level 4). When hepatocellular carcinoma is not detected by ultrasonographic screening, it is often present in blind areas such as under the diaphragm or in the presence of a rough background liver
(LJ034716 level 1). The detection capability MLN8237 cell line of ultrasonography has frequently been reported to be inferior to that of MRI or CT (LF061987 level 1, LF020018 level 1, LF008079 level 1). In a recent study of livers from liver transplant patients, the sensitivity of ultrasonography for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules was as low as 20.5% (LF0186710 level 2b), and especially low for nodules 2 cm or less in diameter (LF0040611 level 3, LF0186710 level 2b). In contrast,
according to one study in patients with nodules 2 cm MCE or less in diameter, the detection capability of ultrasonography for such lesions was superior to that of MRI or CT (LF0223112 level 1). There are no report of any RCT that have examined differences in the detection rate of hepatocellular carcinoma according to differences in the screening interval, such as 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. In most cases of hepatocellular carcinoma detected by screening of chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis patients by a combination of regular AFP measurements and ultrasonography, the tumor was single (LF019821 level 2a, LF026872 level 2a, LF0246213 level 2a) and small in size (LF0246213 level 2a, LF0211414 level 3, LF0382215 level 3) as compared with the findings in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma detected based on the manifestation of clinical symptoms. In one study of patients with cirrhosis who were screened by AFP measurements every 2 months and ultrasonography every 3 months, 65% of the detected hepatocellular carcinomas were 2 cm or less in diameter (LF0294516 level 2a). In another study in which patients with chronic liver disease were screened by AFP measurements and ultrasonography every 4 and 6 months, 93.3% (LF0187117 level 4) and 80.4% (LF019821 level 2a) of the detected cases were single tumors, respectively.