That is why re-treatment with PEG IFN plus ribavirin is a possibl

That is why re-treatment with PEG IFN plus ribavirin is a possible choice for patients who failed to achieve SVR to previous antiviral therapy or patients ineligible for triple therapy with telaprevir who must wait until next-generation antiviral therapies, such as triple therapy with second-wave protease inhibitors or

selleck IFN-free regimens, become commercially available. As for re-treatment with PEG IFN plus ribavirin, some studies have been reported but the subjects and treatment protocols were varied.15–20 According to past reports, the previous treatment response is associated with the efficacy of the re-treatment17,20 and the SVR rates in re-treatment ranged 4–23%.16–18 Recently, host factors, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) located near the interleukin (IL)-28B gene, and virus factors, such as the amino acid substitutions in the HCV core region, were revealed to have a strong impact on SVR in PEG IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy for naïve CH-C patients.21–26 Moreover, response-guided therapy which extends treatment

duration until 72 weeks for patients with a slow virological response can raise the SVR rate for naïve CH-C patients.27–29 However, the value of IL-28B SNP has been uncertain in re-treatment and the most appropriate treatment duration in re-treatment is still unclear. Although it remains obscure which factors are associated with SVR in re-treatment with standard PEG IFN plus ribavirin therapy Everolimus molecular weight as pointed out above, some patients do respond to re-treatment and it is very important to be able to identify them. Such findings will be valuable for optimizing the antiviral treatment for CH-C patients by making it possible to decide which patients should

be considered for re-treatment with PEG IFN plus ribavirin therapy and which should wait for next-generation antiviral treatment. In the present study, we tried to determine which patients could benefit from re-treatment and to identify the factors associated with SVR in re-treatment, including the host genome SNP and treatment duration. THIS RETROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER Tryptophan synthase study was conducted by the Study Group of Antiviral Therapy for Difficult-to-Treat Chronic Hepatitis C supported by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. This study was conducted with 143 CH-C patients, 113 patients (genotype 1, n = 86; genotype 2, n = 27) who had previously completed PEG IFN-α-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy but had failed to attain SVR, and 30 patients (genotype 1, n = 22; genotype 2, n = 8) who had previously discontinued this combination therapy due to adverse events. For the previous treatment, patients had been treated with PEG IFN-α-2b (PEGINTRON; MSD, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) plus ribavirin (REBETOL; MSD).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>